Among six major exchanges, Gate is the only one whose base-tier maker fee on USDT
perpetuals is negative: −0.01%. Post a limit order, get filled, and the
exchange credits you 0.01% of the notional instead of charging you. Most fee-comparison
sites miss this entirely — several we checked list Gate at "0.02% maker" — because they
copy each other instead of the source. The number is right there in Gate's public futures
contract API: every USDT contract carries maker_fee_rate: "-0.0001".
The catch is on the other side of the book: Gate's 0.075% taker fee is the highest of the six venues we track — nearly double Binance's 0.04%. So whether Gate is your cheapest venue or your most expensive one depends on a single variable: what fraction of your volume executes as maker.
Your blended cost per $1 of volume is m × maker + (1 − m) × taker, where
m is your maker share. Setting Gate's blend equal to each competitor's gives
the exact crossover:
| Compared with | Their VIP-0 fees | Gate is cheaper when maker share ≥ |
|---|---|---|
| Bitget / KuCoin | 0.02% / 0.06% | 33.3% |
| Bybit | 0.02% / 0.055% | 40.0% |
| OKX | 0.02% / 0.05% | 45.5% |
| Binance | 0.02% / 0.04% | 53.8% |
In dollars, per $1M of monthly volume: at 100% maker share Gate nets you −$100 (a credit) while every other venue charges $200. At 0% maker it costs $750 versus Binance's $400. At the typical retail mix — mostly market orders — Gate is the worst of the six on execution cost.
The rebate structurally favors flow that is passive by design: resting grid or range orders, patient position entries worked at the bid, and any strategy whose maker share is already above ~50% on other venues. If that describes your execution, Gate's base tier is arithmetically the cheapest of the six. If your flow is mostly market orders, the same table says to look elsewhere — run your own numbers in the fee calculator.